FAQ

On Dec 22, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Neil Bowers wrote:

Any thoughts on what factors should be included in such a metric? I think it should really include factors that it would be hard for anyone to argue with. Currently the individual factors are:

Not having too many CPAN Testers fails
Having a META.json or META.yml file
Specifying the min perl version required for the dist
Number (and age if possible) of open tickets might show if someone's paying attention to the dist. Like David said, much like the adoption criteria. The issues don't have to be valid, they could even be spam for all it matters, as long as someone's taking care of them.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 3 of 21 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupcpan-workers @
categoriesperl
postedDec 22, '15 at 11:05p
activeJan 4, '16 at 9:39p
posts21
users12
websitecpan.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase