FAQ
Jörn, to avoid ambiguity in case you addressed me to propose a WSD
interface. I'd prefer Anthony to come up with a proposal, because he is
closer to the multiple WSD algorithms that would be nice to include in the
analysis.

Aliaksandr
On 16 February 2015 at 15:19, Joern Kottmann wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:09 +0100, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote:
Since you're perhaps deeper in this that others you seem to be the
best
candidate to make a proposal, to check the state of the art algorithms
and
devise general enough interface for all or most of them. One way could
be
to see what the algorithms typically require, how diverse are sources
of
senses (WordNet alone has multiple different interfaces to access it),
which options do the algorithms take and start somewhere there to see
that
the interface is flexible enough to accommodate that diversity, has
ability
to do some built-in checks (such as detecting the case of algorithm
trained
on one source of senses working with another, or perhaps algorithm
relying
on a relation which is missing in the sense source) and be similar to
the
rest of OpenNLP. We might even end up with two interfaces (e.g. for
sense
provider and for WSD itself).

What do you think about this way?
Please propose an interface. We will discuss it here on the list.

Jörn

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 7 of 10 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupdev @
categoriesopennlp
postedJan 15, '15 at 7:50a
activeFeb 18, '15 at 1:52p
posts10
users3
websiteopennlp.apache.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase