HEllo all

I am well aware of the Reply to Can't configure to build static library on
Mac OS X 10.4.9 http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus/6594

However, I disagree with the argument that a GPL-ed library should be linked
dynamically. Licence terms are legal stuff, linking mode is technical stuff.

I would explain concretely.

I only want to use mysqlpp in small CGI programs I am writing (opensource
GPL licence). I am pretty sure I am not alone. But such CGI programs are
deployed (ie used) on small cheap web sites, whose web hosting company
usually does not provide any additional shared libraries than the barely
essentials (like libmysqlclient, libc, libdl, libm and their dependencies).
Some hosting companies don't even put a libstdc++.so - you need to link it

So I am not able to use libmysqlpp because it has no static version, even
when coding GPL-ed free software.

And I was not able to patch quickly the libmysqlpp source to enable static
linking on linux/Debian/Etch/AMD64 ou linux/Debian/Etch/x86 - apparently the
Debian maintainer was not able neither :-(

So there are valid reasons to ship a statically linked version, even for a
GPL library (and of course also for LGPL).


Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 1 of 4 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupplusplus @
postedMay 17, '07 at 7:54p
activeMay 18, '07 at 2:14p



site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase