FAQ
That is a fair point. And I concur, that until core ups its minimum JRE
requirement, compiler shouldn't move past that...

Raises the question should core up to 1.6... I don't see a pressing need
yet...

Lambdas are not until 1.8, and we don't do the crazy generics stuff that,
for example, forced Jenkins to require 1.6 to build. So without a pressing
need, I think core should stay on 1.5 for now

On 29 November 2012 10:39, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:

Leaving aside questions of compatibility, Java 7 as compiler default would
be a poor choice. After all, that would require JRE 7 as a standard for
running Maven, or using one of the Eclipse compilers. Otherwise, that would
be unsupported by the compiler.



On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Ron Wheeler <
rwheeler@artifact-software.com
wrote:
+1
On 28/11/2012 1:36 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:

Now that Oracle are controlling Java on OSX we can no longer "blame
Apple" - I'd love to see the default become Java 7 now.

And if one needs to lock down to the older versions, lock them down.


On 29/11/2012, at 7:07 AM, Curtis Rueden wrote:

Good to know that Maven is now only 8 years behind.
I blame Apple.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102


------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.**apache.org<
users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org

--
The best argument for celibacy is that the clergy will sooner or later
become extinct.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 17 of 32 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupusers @
categoriesmaven
postedNov 16, '12 at 9:43a
activeNov 29, '12 at 8:42p
posts32
users12
websitemaven.apache.org
irc#maven

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase