On Sunday, 9 December 2012, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
going, but I'm firmly opposed
to including a brand new logging framework as default in m3.
2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
Perso I'm fine using log4j2.
I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy.
Log4j2 has quickly added a feature I needed and release it.
Furthermore I'm fine working with an Apache community in case of any
issue we could have.
I'm not entirely sure I follow where this discussion is actuallyI use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy.
Log4j2 has quickly added a feature I needed and release it.
Furthermore I'm fine working with an Apache community in case of any
issue we could have.
going, but I'm firmly opposed
to including a brand new logging framework as default in m3.
Kristian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
