FAQ
+1 from me
On Friday, 7 December 2012, Jesse McConnell wrote:

I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :)

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com <javascript:;>



On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of commits to
core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a very
strong preference.

I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing 3.1.0
to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible changes
make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them.

The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think users
will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on top

My €0.02

- Stephen
On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote:

It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework while
for
the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a difference.
I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user to
use
this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log and
control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more interesting, even
if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long as
it
works.
Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, but
that's a small group.

Robert

Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl <
jason@tesla.io
:


On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscholte@apache.org> wrote:
If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to
include
the colored logger as well.


I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without discussion

1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution

or

2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default

Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this point so
what's the rush?

That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require
extra
adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it seems to
work out of the box, but we have to be sure.)


Robert


Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies <
bimargulies@gmail.com>:

As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, and
I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. I'd
be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for the
release 'as is'.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:

good idea, Benson.

Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this is
not
because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of
comments
in the thread.

1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to introduce a new
plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical problem with
that?

Are there other proposals which might help increasing backward
compatibility?



2.) what about the coloured logger with log4j2? I tried it locally and
it
worked great. What is the status? (Sorry if I missed something)



LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----

From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: Maven Developers List <

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase