FAQ

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
If we forget the bytecode modification for a moment, how much cost does this
add to Lucene when used by a real application with slf4j logging? (e.g. Solr
uses the jdk adapter and no-op adapter cannot be used)
AFAIK, the infostream stuff is only in IndexWriter. There shouldn't
be a measurable
performance impact.

My concerns had more to do with future patches and the places some
users may want to start adding logging (potentially anywhere they have
ever had a problem). I'm communicating those concerns now to get
people to think twice before peppering Lucene full of logging
statements. Sometimes a debugger is the right tool for the job
instead.

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 8 of 10 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupjava-dev @
categorieslucene
postedJan 8, '09 at 5:03p
activeJan 11, '09 at 6:52a
posts10
users4
websitelucene.apache.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase