FAQ
Your test case did not make it. Perhaps you could attach it to a
bugzilla bug report?

Doug

danrapp@comcast.net wrote:
The changes to StandardTokeinzer.jj have introduced a problem into a usage pattern I'm employing in my application. (See attached test case)

I haven't had a chance to look into this very much, but I'm guessing its due to the fact that the ideogram sequence isn't tokenized when added to the index (due to adding it as a keyword), but it is tokenized when parsing the query...

Any suggestions for working around this? I'd prefer to leave the document.add(Field.Keyword(...)) pattern.

--Dan



------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 3 of 3 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupjava-dev @
categorieslucene
postedDec 24, '03 at 10:30p
activeDec 24, '03 at 11:55p
posts3
users3
websitelucene.apache.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase