Grokbase Groups Lucene dev July 2008
FAQ
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662687#action_12662687 ]

Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1345:
--------------------------------------

John, Michael,

bq. Given the perf number improvements we see, can we consider up the priority?

I think most of the performance improvements that John posted can be moved into
trunk without the addition of Filter as a clause to BooleanQuery, so I'd rather let
these go first.

Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
--------------------------------------

Key: LUCENE-1345
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Reporter: Paul Elschot
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.9

Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java, DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java, TestIteratorPerf.java

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 40 of 68 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupdev @
categorieslucene
postedJul 23, '08 at 9:42p
activeJun 11, '09 at 3:11p
posts68
users7
websitelucene.apache.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase