Grokbase Groups Hive dev October 2010
FAQ
We could, but given the flaky state of the tests on that branch, I'd rather not since it will just be noise. Let's instead keep squelching the sporadic failures on trunk with a goal to eliminate noise for the 0.7 release (which will get a Hudson config).

JVS
On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote:

Those tests run fine for me.

Is there any chance that we can setup a Hudson job for the 0.6 branch on
hudson.apache.org?
It should be pretty straightforward to do if we copy the configuration from
here:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hive-trunk-h0.20/

Thanks.

Carl
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote:

I got the following test failures on the release candidate...

groupby2.q
groupby3.q
groupby4.q
groupby5.q
groupby6.q

not sure if this is just in my env or if others have seen this...

A sample of the diff is below and seems to be related to some plan ordering
or some change in plan. Is anyone else getting this?

Ashish

-------------------------
[junit] diff -b -I'\(\(<java version=".*"
class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">\)\|\(<string>.*/tmp/.*</string>\)\|\(<string>file:.*</string>\)\|\(<string>[0-9]\{10\}</string>\)\|\(<string>/.*/warehouse/.*</string>\)\)'
/data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/build/ql/test/logs/positive/groupby6.q.xml
/data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/ql/src/test/results/compiler/plan/groupby6.q.xml
[junit] 352,353c352
[junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum"
method="valueOf">
[junit] <
<class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
[junit] ---
[junit] > <object
class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">
[junit] 878,879c877
[junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum" method="valueOf">
[junit] <
<class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
[junit] ---
[junit] > <object
class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">

--------------------------

________________________________________
From: John Sichi [jsichi@facebook.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:22 PM
To: <dev@hive.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] hive 0.6.0 release candidate 0

Yeah, the scripts should only be needed in configurations where JDO is told
not to automatically update the schema. This is recommended for production
environments.

For this particular release, taking a downtime while running the scripts is
a good idea due to the nature of the changes (e.g. altering the primary key
on COLS). That needn't be true in general for additive-only changes.

JVS
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:38 PM, John Sichi wrote:
The tarballs are at

http://people.apache.org/~jvs/hive-0.6.0-candidate-0

Carl did some sanity testing on it already, but any additional testing
you can do before voting helps to ensure a quality release.
JVS
I am checking it out now. It seems like since i have used two trunk
versions since hive the view related tables have already been created.
I do not need the update script.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 6 of 10 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupdev @
categorieshive, hadoop
postedOct 20, '10 at 10:38p
activeOct 26, '10 at 7:05p
posts10
users5
websitehive.apache.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase