Mark
On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
We've discussed several options:
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
The vote will run the normal 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
We've discussed several options:
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
The vote will run the normal 7 days.
thanks,
Arun
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
