FAQ
Oh, really?? That's great! I could simplify some part of my code! But I did
not learn it from the language spec and Effective Go. Is it documented
somewhere?

Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:53 PM, xingtao zhao wrote:
Should we think about a feature request for this? I mean: if X is
anonymously embedded in Y, then Y will have the method set of X, and *Y will
have the method set of *X?
That is true today.

Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 17 of 19 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-nuts @
categoriesgo
postedAug 27, '15 at 10:48p
activeAug 29, '15 at 1:56a
posts19
users7
websitegolang.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase