That seems like a valid reason to avoid an internal package. But I would
still question why not vendor a third-party package?
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 4:33:29 AM UTC-7, Nigel Tao wrote:

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Bryan Matsuo <bryan....@gmail.com
<javascript:>> wrote:
And, maybe I'm missing something but it doesn't look like any exported APIs
in golang.org/x/mobile/... expose f32 types directly (other than the f32
package itself). It seems like the entire package could be deleted today and
an internal/vendored package used until the appropriate arithmetic
operations are added to x/image/math/f32.

Is there a reason not to do that?
A bunch of example programs under x/mobile/example import
"golang.org/x/mobile/exp/f32", and the idea is that you should be able
to copy and tweak those examples.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 13 of 17 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-dev @
postedMar 29, '16 at 3:30p
activeMar 31, '16 at 12:58p



site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase