On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Russ Cox wrote:
But in an important
library like compress/flate it might still be worth doing for as much as a
20% overall reduction if the amount of assembly is reasonable. There's no
hard line. (Klaus's excellent work is going to make it that much more
reasonable to start compressing our package archives.)
Changing the topic... if compression throughput performance affects
whether or not it's reasonable to compress our package archives, have
we considered (and rejected??) using snappy instead of gzip?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 1 of 3 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-dev @
postedMar 11, '16 at 12:04a
activeMar 11, '16 at 2:47p

3 users in discussion

Russ Cox: 1 post Nigel Tao: 1 post Joe Tsai: 1 post



site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase