On 7 Lis, 20:18, Russ Cox wrote:
It sounds like those definitions were written with an incorrect
understanding of what C_PBIT means.
Russ
It sounds like those definitions were written with an incorrect
understanding of what C_PBIT means.
Russ
By the way, I think that "PBIT" (literally "P bit") in C_PBIT flag
name is misleading, especially when C_WBIT is treaded in opposite way.
This probably causes bug in 5a.
It will be better to change C_PBIT name to something less confusing
(eg: C_PREI like "preindex"). Same C_UBIT name should be changed to
something like C_SUBO "subtract offset".
