On Tuesday 13 March 2012 13.07.52 Tilman Schmidt wrote:
On most of the CentOS 5 machines I manage, if I run "yum list
installed" the third column just says "installed" for all
packages. But on one machine, some lines show instead a repo
name preceded by an @ sign. Apparently the repo from which the
package was installed, which would be immensely useful.
Two questions:
On most of the CentOS 5 machines I manage, if I run "yum list
installed" the third column just says "installed" for all
packages. But on one machine, some lines show instead a repo
name preceded by an @ sign. Apparently the repo from which the
package was installed, which would be immensely useful.
Two questions:
about a week ago.
Regarding the "strange" yum version on the one machine a quick google would
suggest it came from a c5-testing repo at one time (with lots of disclaimers
not to use it outside of testing...).
/Peter
1. Can I have that feature on the other CentOS 5 machines too?
The machine in question has yum version 3.2.27-12.el5_from_el6
while all others have version 3.2.22-39.el5.centos.
Where did that "el5_from_el6" version come from? The "yum list"
entry for yum itself does unfortunately not show a repo name.
2. Can anything be done about the lines still saying only
"installed"? How do find out where those packages came from?
aTdHvAaNnKcSe
Tilman
-------------- next part --------------The machine in question has yum version 3.2.27-12.el5_from_el6
while all others have version 3.2.22-39.el5.centos.
Where did that "el5_from_el6" version come from? The "yum list"
entry for yum itself does unfortunately not show a repo name.
2. Can anything be done about the lines still saying only
"installed"? How do find out where those packages came from?
aTdHvAaNnKcSe
Tilman
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120313/a2757a1b/attachment.bin
