-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Brady
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 18:39
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Brady
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 18:39
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync
On 14/04/11 7:42 AM, Mailing List wrote:
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
=======
Glad you've got a fix but you should keep an eye on it.
If you look at the output for ntpq you have three stratum 2 servers
which differ by ~15s from both you and each other. Stratum 2 servers
should be a lot closer than 15s given that they are only one link
removed from some form of atomic clock.
I think you may be comparing a couple of rotting apples to one that isbindcat.fhsu.ed 132.163.4.101 2 u 1015 1024 377 49.987 - 15082.
6919.88
216.45.57.38 108.71.253.18 2 u 998 1024 377 83.112 - 15139.
6900.14
javanese.kjsl.c 69.36.224.15 2 u 1 1024 377 109.083 - 29233.
7285.83
*LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 13 64 377 0.000 0.000
0.001
<snip>6919.88
216.45.57.38 108.71.253.18 2 u 998 1024 377 83.112 - 15139.
6900.14
javanese.kjsl.c 69.36.224.15 2 u 1 1024 377 109.083 - 29233.
7285.83
*LOCAL(0) .LOCL. 10 l 13 64 377 0.000 0.000
0.001
Glad you've got a fix but you should keep an eye on it.
If you look at the output for ntpq you have three stratum 2 servers
which differ by ~15s from both you and each other. Stratum 2 servers
should be a lot closer than 15s given that they are only one link
removed from some form of atomic clock.
just now ripening.
when offset
1015 15082
998 15139
1 29233
i.e., the samples that are 17 seconds apart in the taking are .057S
apart in value, and trending longer.
