On 22/10/2011, at 20:12, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:36:06AM -0500, Anssi Johansson wrote:
Anssi Johansson kirjoitti:
Hi, this message is related to the enhancement request I filed at
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?idF52 where I proposed to have an
IPv6-enabled CentOS torrent tracker.
I'm delighted to notice that nobody seems to have any objections
regarding this idea. So, when can we expect to see the new IPv6-enabled
torrent tracker?
You mention in the previous note that you're using opentracker. What
has your experience been with opentracker and IPv6? It's been about a
year since I looked into this for Fedora's use, but opentracker was
too buggy (trivial to crash with a query URL) to be usable. Has it
improved enough to be considered stable? Have they fixed it so you
can have a single binary rather than two (one for IPv4 and one for
IPv6) ?
I am using transmission daemon with Fedora in an IPv6 setup. Indeed, I did not know that transmission supported IPv6, until I see lots of v6 traffic after tunnel setup. I had to config absolutely nothing! It just woks...

>

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 4 of 5 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupcentos-mirror @
categoriescentos
postedSep 24, '11 at 7:28p
activeOct 23, '11 at 6:06a
posts5
users3
websitecentos.org
irc#centos

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase