FAQ
If the updated qpid package is primarily for use with OpenStack, perhaps the
rdo repos will be a good place? Then there is less concern over breaking
scenarios that may not have been tested.


http://openstack.redhat.com/Repositories




-----Original Message-----
From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
[mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 2:08 AM
To: centos-devel at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Providing newer versions of packages from base
CentOS/RHEL

On 05/07/2014 09:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Can it be packaged up as qpid026 ? The main issue you are going to run
into with any of the solutions is how to deal with potential conflicts
of a person having software which requires qpid014 and qpid026 required.

we could put this sort of an update into CentOS Plus - then the question
turns around a bit into a : Does this update satisfy the prev api/abi and
libpaths ? ie. is this a drop in replacement to the older code ?


- KB


--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 5 of 7 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupcentos-devel @
categoriescentos
postedMay 7, '14 at 8:27p
activeMay 12, '14 at 5:51p
posts7
users5
websitecentos.org
irc#centos

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase