Search Discussions

5 discussions - 11 posts

  • Hi All, This is my first post to the list. Please let me know if the format is not acceptable. I have two questions and here's the code to show them. (1) The way the IDENT production is written does ...
    Eric LiaoEric Liao
    Sep 4, 2001 at 7:43 pm
    Sep 10, 2001 at 5:53 pm
  • Howdy All, I am once again (no big surprise here) puzzled about some RecDescent behaviour. Would anyone care to attempt to explain in small words why the following snippet won't parse? ...
    Ken LacrosseKen Lacrosse
    Sep 28, 2001 at 9:39 pm
    Sep 29, 2001 at 12:32 am
  • The following fragment exhibits some odd (to me) behaviour in that the @item array in the phrases rule does not return the value for the conjunction subrule although the %item hash does contain it. ...
    Ken LacrosseKen Lacrosse
    Sep 24, 2001 at 10:28 pm
    Sep 25, 2001 at 1:10 am
  • My apologies if this question is so basic that it's off-topic for the list. As part of my job, I have to do a lot of work munging message files; each file contains information about multiple ...
    Chris WarrenChris Warren
    Sep 24, 2001 at 1:16 pm
    Sep 24, 2001 at 3:36 pm
  • Why would the following grammar not parse the test case? Note: it's (apparently) failing on the terminating X. Ken use Parse::RecDescent; my $parse = Parse::RecDescent- new(join '', <DATA ) or die ...
    Ken LacrosseKen Lacrosse
    Sep 18, 2001 at 2:36 am
    Sep 18, 2001 at 2:54 am
Group Navigation
period‹ prev | Sep 2001 | next ›
Group Overview
grouprecdescent @