FAQ

Search Discussions

10 discussions - 104 posts

  • This is mostly just a gratuitous message so that Piers has something to talk about in the next summary ;-), but when's the next Apocalypse due out? In these quiet times, it would be nice to hear from ...
    Jonathan Scott DuffJonathan Scott Duff
    Sep 9, 2003 at 8:01 pm
    Jun 29, 2004 at 10:16 pm
  • So I sit here and think for a minute about how nice it will be in P6 to be able to define operator infix:eqi($str1, $str2) {...} for doing if ($1 eqi "last") and I think about the whole 'C' string ...
    Austin HastingsAustin Hastings
    Sep 26, 2003 at 8:34 pm
    Sep 29, 2003 at 3:46 pm
  • At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 "Doubloon" has been released! This release features direct generation of executable binaries, dramatically improved documentation, and a built-in bread maker! Get it while ...
    Steve FinkSteve Fink
    Sep 20, 2003 at 7:59 am
    Sep 22, 2003 at 6:19 pm
  • The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030907 Welcome to the last Perl 6 summary of my 35th year. Next week's summary will (in theory) be written on my 36th birthday (a year of being square, so no ...
    Piers CawleyPiers Cawley
    Sep 8, 2003 at 3:55 pm
    Sep 29, 2003 at 3:41 pm
  • I have a question/request concerning perl6 object properties. I've done some work with .NET and They have come up with a really slick way to handle object properties. A typical property definition in ...
    Todd W.Todd W.
    Sep 24, 2003 at 11:52 pm
    Sep 25, 2003 at 1:58 pm
  • So, I was wondering about how to do multidispatch based on the context in which something is called, which leads me to wonder if there's going to be a way of reifying calling context so I could ...
    Piers CawleyPiers Cawley
    Sep 8, 2003 at 8:24 am
    Sep 8, 2003 at 8:39 am
  • Good point to raise, but I'm not sure about your conclusion. 12 and 13 don't exist *in registers,* but they do certainly do exist at various points: in the original source, in the AST, and in the ...
    Gordon HenriksenGordon Henriksen
    Sep 17, 2003 at 12:07 am
    Sep 17, 2003 at 12:07 am
  • I was reading through E6 again, and noticed something a little troubling: sub part (*@_ is rw) {...} Well, I<of course @_ C<is rw ! Otherwise we wouldn't be able to C<shift things off of it. What was ...
    Luke PalmerLuke Palmer
    Sep 13, 2003 at 10:32 am
    Sep 13, 2003 at 10:32 am
  • The full answer to this would be partial evaluation. See: http://www.dina.dk/~sestoft/pebook/ Partial evaluators exist for languages like scheme, ML and even C (don't look at the C one for a clean ...
    Alex BurrAlex Burr
    Sep 12, 2003 at 5:49 pm
    Sep 12, 2003 at 5:49 pm
  • The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030831 Welcome to this week's Perl 6 summary. This week, for one week only I'm going to break with a long established summary tradition. No, that doesn't mean ...
    Piers CawleyPiers Cawley
    Sep 1, 2003 at 12:30 pm
    Sep 1, 2003 at 12:30 pm
Group Navigation
period‹ prev | Sep 2003 | next ›
Group Overview
groupperl6-language @
categoriesperl
discussions10
posts104
users35
websiteperl6.org

35 users for September 2003

Dan Sugalski: 18 posts Luke Palmer: 12 posts Austin Hastings: 9 posts Piers Cawley: 7 posts Piers Cawley: 6 posts Gordon Henriksen: 5 posts Chromatic: 3 posts Eirik Berg Hanssen: 3 posts Jonadab the Unsightly One: 3 posts Simon Cozens: 3 posts Steve Fink: 3 posts Martin: 2 posts Alex Burr: 2 posts Andy Wardley: 2 posts Gerrit P. Haase: 2 posts Jonathan Scott Duff: 2 posts Larry Wall: 2 posts Nicholas Clark: 2 posts Todd W.: 2 posts Alex Burr: 1 post
show more
Archives