Search Discussions

6 discussions - 37 posts

  • syphilis posted a complaint on PM that is worth looking at: http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=640699 I agree that this should probably not be a FAIL. Forcing an "NA" with "OS unsupported" is also not the ...
    David GoldenDavid Golden
    Sep 24, 2007 at 12:38 pm
    Sep 27, 2007 at 3:11 pm
  • OK. I just committed a bugfix to the CPAN.pm source such that ut will not continue into the "make" stage if a Makefile was not created. I tested it on CPAN::Test::Dummy::Perl5::Make::PLExit and it no ...
    David GoldenDavid Golden
    Sep 27, 2007 at 4:18 pm
    Sep 28, 2007 at 9:01 am
  • I'm about to release Devel::CheckOS (which lets you ask things like 'is this a Unix system?') and Devel::AssertOS, which came out of discussions here last week. The Makefile.PL is interactive. ...
    David CantrellDavid Cantrell
    Sep 30, 2007 at 3:23 pm
    Sep 30, 2007 at 7:26 pm
  • Gaal Yahas, when discussing with him by email why I just tested some hideously ancient module which is deprecated and replaced with something else, said that it would be a good idea if there was a ...
    David CantrellDavid Cantrell
    Sep 13, 2007 at 4:53 pm
    Sep 13, 2007 at 5:19 pm
  • [crosspost from the mod_perl mailing list, at recommendation of others on the MP list] Wanted to ping the list about something that's irked me the last few days... After recently releasing ...
    Graham TerMarschGraham TerMarsch
    Sep 26, 2007 at 5:21 pm
    Sep 26, 2007 at 5:21 pm
  • CPAN testers requests the opinion of someone with MakeMaker / C compiler fu. They foolishly asked me. :) Anyone have a thought? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: PM post on Makefile.PL ...
    Michael G SchwernMichael G Schwern
    Sep 25, 2007 at 2:23 am
    Sep 25, 2007 at 2:23 am
Group Navigation
period‹ prev | Sep 2007 | next ›
Group Overview
groupcpan-testers-discuss @