Grokbase
x

Alfred von Campe (a...@von-campe.com)

Profile | Posts (39)

User Information

Display Name:Alfred von Campe
Partial Email Address:a...@von-campe.com
Posts:
39 total
39 in CentOS

5 Most Recent

All Posts
1) Alfred von Campe [CentOS] Issue with package-cleanup --oldkernels with PAE kernel
| +1 vote
I'm not sure if this is a bug, known issue, feature, etc. On my CentOS systems with the PAE kernel...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
I'm not sure if this is a bug, known issue, feature, etc.  On my  
CentOS systems with the PAE kernel installed, package-cleanup behaves  
as follows:

   # rpm -q kernel
   package kernel is not installed
   # rpm -q kernel-PAE
   kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
   kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5
   kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
   # uname -r
   2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE
   # package-cleanup --oldkernels --count 2
   Setting up yum
   Error all kernel rpms are set to be removed

Has anyone else seen this?  Is this expected behavior or a (known) bug?

Alfred

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2) Alfred von Campe Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using Review Board on CentOS 5?
| +1 vote
Oops, I guess I didn't read far enough down on the GettingStarted page. Thanks for pointing that...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
On Dec 4, 2008, at 13:28, R P Herrold wrote:

> cough cough  ... as pointed to by INSTALL
>
> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted
> http://f13o.blogspot.com/2008/01/install-reviewboard-on-
> centos-51.html

Oops, I guess I didn't read far enough down on the GettingStarted  
page.  Thanks for pointing that out (I say with a red face).

Alfred

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
3) Alfred von Campe [CentOS] Is anyone using Review Board on CentOS 5?
| +1 vote
I'm trying to install Review Board (http://review-board.org) with python-setup tools and "sudo...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
I'm trying to install Review Board (http://review-board.org) with
python-setup tools and "sudo easy_install ReviewBoard", but this  
fails as follows:

easy_install ReviewBoard
Searching for ReviewBoard
Best match: ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081202
Processing ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081202-py2.4.egg
ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081202 is already the active version in easy-
install.pth
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin

Using /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081202-
py2.4.egg
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
Searching for PIL
Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/
Best match: PIL 1.1.6
Downloading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/
PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
Processing PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
Running PIL-1.1.6/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-
t4JHIx/PIL-1.1.6/egg-dist-tmp-t3asKn
The required version of setuptools (>=0.6c7) is not available, and
can't be installed while this script is running. Please install
  a more recent version first.

(Currently using setuptools 0.6c5 (/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages))
error: Setup script exited with 2

Unfortunately, the python-setuptools for CentOS 5 is version  
0.6c5-2.  I already have python-imaging-1.1.5-5 installed, but the  
configuration is trying to install PIL 1.1.6.  I've never used  
easy_install/python-setuptools before (I'd never heard of it until I  
read the installation instructions for Review Board), so I don't know  
if it's possible to modify the configuration files to use PIL 1.1.5.   
Or if there is another/better way to install Review Board.  So before  
I re-invent the wheel, has anyone else successfully installed Review  
Board on CentOS 5 and is willing to share their experience?

Thanks,
Alfred

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
4) Alfred von Campe Re: [CentOS] Problems with firstboot in CentOS 5
| +1 vote
Done: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3200 Thanks, Alfred
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
> The easy way to do this would be to open an issue report at
> bugs.centos.org/ and someone can work with you to verify the bug
> exists.

Done: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3200

Thanks,
Alfred

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
5) Alfred von Campe Re: [CentOS] Problems with firstboot in CentOS 5
| +1 vote
Has anyone seen these issues? Is anybody using firstboot (or care about it)? If there is there a...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Yesterday I wrote:

> I'm trying to customize the firstboot process in CentOS 5 and have
> come across a few issues that are driving me nuts. I'm sure they
> are all upstream issues, but I don't have a RHEL 5 system to verify
> them. I had these customizations working in CentOS 4, but things
> that used to work then don't work now.
>
> The main problem is that you can't validate user input. This
> problem can be easily seen in the firstboot "Create User" module.
> If you are in this screen, deliberately enter mismatched
> passwords. You will get a warning that the passwords do not match,
> but when you click OK to dismiss the warning you are taken to the
> next screen. In CentOS 4, firstboot would stay at the current
> screen until all user input had been validated. If you look at the
> underlying Python code, when you returned "None" from the apply
> method it would not exit the module in CentOS 4, but it does in
> CentOS 5.
>
> I also can't get the firstboot Display module to load. It ships
> with "skipme = True", but setting it to false or removing that line
> altogether does not show the module. It appears to me that there a
> lots of issues with firstboot in CentOS 5. Actually, in my
> environment (~40 desktops), CentOS 5 has been far less stable than
> CentOS 4 (mostly Gnome issues with Terminal windows crashing and
> window "flickering"). I've reported some of these issues before on
> this list. My servers seem to be rock stable, though.
>
> Anyway, for now I will have to live with these issues. Can I
> report these issues in the Red Hat bugzilla database or do I need
> to be a RHN subscriber to report bugs against RHEL5? I suspect
> (but have not verified) that these issues have been addressed in
> Fedora already.

Has anyone seen these issues?  Is anybody using firstboot (or care  
about it)?  If there is there a better forum where I can go for  
firstboot questions, please let me know.  Ideally, I would like the  
upstream provider to acknowledge this issue and include a fix in the  
next update release, but how can I best make that happen?

Alfred

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

spacer
Profile | Posts (39)
Home > People > Alfred von Campe