Lars Nielsen Lind (s...@tidtilforandring.dk)

Hi,

are there any toturials regarding Editor2 available?

thank,

Lars

Hi,

is it possible to make Dojo validate W3C specifications and how?

thanks,

Lars

Hi, I have some problems with Dojo wizard and IE (using ver. 7).

When I load the page with the wizard it shows step 2 content in the
bottom of the browser (1-2. sek.). When I load the page in Firefox
there's no problem.

Any solutions?

Thanks,

Lars Nielsen Lind

Hi,

I have tried to download mod_watch from Snert but it seems to be closed.
If you want to graph traffic with MRTG pr. virtual host (incl.
namebased) are there any other modules available - or other tools for
Apache/Tomcat.

Thanks,

Lars Nielsen Lind


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: [email protected: u...@tomcat.apache.org]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected: users-unsubs...@tomcat.apache.org]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected: users...@tomcat.apache.org]

In regards to the aspects about the architecture I believe that the
choice of using JSP and Java technology is a good one for you and your
customers.  The reason is the possibility for using Web services, 
services and in the hopefully near future Semantic Web technologies. Its
a fact that it is a scaleable solution with perspective for further
development of the site/sites. And what about portals/portlets?

I have no experience with PHP - so is the above possible with PHP?

Lars Nielsen Lind



Andrew Miehs skrev:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear List,
>
> JSP is designed to be used for Websites. Depending what you do with
> it, changes where it can be used for a Large Web Site.
>
> As for the questions.
>
> 1a. Who cares if JSP is not supported by web hosting companies - Large
> web sites have their own infrastructure.
> 1b. Both are programming languages - both have strengths and
> weaknesses - you can do the same thing with both -
> you could even use plain 'c' if you feel like it. Use which ever you
> are most comfortable with.
> 2. How many users a 'language' has is irrelevant. Glad to see you are
> quoting informative sources. :-)
>
> Architecture is the issue - not language.
>
> Andrew
>
> </grrr>
>
> On 30/11/2006, at 3:11 PM, John Mok wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 1a. JSP is not supported by many web hosting companies
>>> or is only supported in more expensive dedicated
>>> server plans. In contrast, open source alternatives
>>> such as php is well-supported by web hosting
>>> companies.
>>> -> Result: most small and medium sized
>>> websites/webapps that do not need a dedicated server
>>> use php.
>>> 1b. JSP has many great features. But php is also very
>>> powerful and has some capabilities that jsp doesn't
>>> have.
>>> -> Result: some heavy-traffic websites/webapps that
>>> require dedicated servers use jsp. Some others use php
>>> (eg. yahoo
>>> [http://news.com.com/2100-1023-963937.html]).
>>> -> 2. There are more php users than jsp users.
>>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFFbuqNW126qUNSzvURAmPTAJ9p2ShOSlLfLZXIbxRAzdNNEmuRJQCdG6i0
> X6KSGAP8rAUERmUS7mpgVKg=
> =Qlh7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: [email protected: u...@tomcat.apache.org]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected: users-unsubs...@tomcat.apache.org]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected: users...@tomcat.apache.org]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: [email protected: u...@tomcat.apache.org]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected: users-unsubs...@tomcat.apache.org]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected: users...@tomcat.apache.org]