Grokbase
Topics Posts Groups | in
x
[ help ]

Mag Gam (mag...@gmail.com)

Profile | Posts (29)Page 1 of 2: 1 2 > >>
1) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux
| +1 vote
thanks everyone for your fair and balanced opinions and experiences! ...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
thanks everyone for your fair and balanced opinions and experiences!




On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Davide Cittaro
<davide.cittaro@ifom-ieo-campus.it> wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
>
>> I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
>> storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
>> 20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
>> seems no other native Linux FS supports it.
>>
>
> Even if fuse implementation of ZFS looks rather stable, I won't
> suggest it in a production environment...
> We strongly wanted ZFS and we chose for Solaris 10 for our file server.
>
>> My question are: Is ZFS stable? How does it scale for very large
>> filesytems, ie, 2TB to 9TB? How is the performance of fuse? I plan to
>> use it on my archive server first, so data reliability is very
>> important
>
> ZFS really is great. We are now managing three 18Tb archives. It is
> not only reliable, it comes with zpool and zfs commands that really
> make it easy to manage!
> If you don't want Solaris, you can use FreeBSD 7 which supports native
> ZFS.
>
> d
>
> Davide Cittaro
> [email protected: davide.ci...@ifom-ieo-campus.it]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2) Mag Gam [CentOS] ZFS on Linux
| +1 vote
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am storing is very large text files...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am
storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to
20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it
seems no other native Linux FS supports it.

My question are: Is ZFS stable? How does it scale for very large
filesytems, ie, 2TB to 9TB? How is the performance of fuse? I plan to
use it on my archive server first, so data reliability is very
important

Any thoughts or ideas?

TIA
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
3) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] bonding theory question
| +1 vote
So, I decided to go with mode 6 since my network admin says thats supported at my college. I have...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
So, I decided to go with mode 6 since my network admin says thats
supported at my college.

I have everything working perfectly however I still get an occasional
packet drop which is not good.

http://www.howtoforge.com/network_card_bonding_centos


By reading the HOWTO and README.txt I am not sure if I am missing
anything else. Has anyone else configured this before?

TIA





On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
<filbranden@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 13:11, Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Actually, would there be a big performance boost when using mode4?
>
> Not necessarily, since balance-rr already gives you load-balancing.
> They actually implement it differently. balance-rr can spread packets
> of the same TCP connection across the two links, so you may use your
> links more, but with the side effect of having your packets delivered
> out of order. In 802.3ad all packets of a single TCP connection will
> use the same link, this means your links will not be as balanced as
> what you get with balance-rr, but it will not require reordering on
> the other side of the connection. Check section 12.1.1 in
> /usr/share/doc/iputils-*/README.bonding . In any case, you should
> evaluate what your needs are and tune for that.
>
>> Currently I am seeing 95% total throughput.
>
> If you have only a few clients doing huge transfers, 802.3ad will
> probably not be as good as balance-rr for that. Again, you should tune
> it for your needs.
>
>> Which isn't that bad. I am
>> peaking at 238MB/sec (each gig/e connections)
>
> I believe you mean 238MB/sec on both interfaces, since 1Gbps = 125MB/s.
>
>> Also, mode0 does fault tolerance, meaning if a switch failure occurs
>> we should still be good, but how would the packets then be
>> transferred? I suppose rr would be disabled since it won't need to
>> alternate, correct?
>
> Actually balance-rr is still there, it is only doing round-robin of
> one interface only. Remember, you could have a bonding of 3, 4 or more
> interfaces, in that case if you loose one you still have more than one
> to balance traffic through.
>
> Filipe
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
4) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] strict memory
| +1 vote
Hi John: Well, we run a lot of statistical analysis and our code loads a lot of data into a vector...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Hi John:

Well, we run a lot of statistical analysis and our code loads a lot of
data into a vector for fast calculations. I am not sure how else to do
these calculations fast without loading it into memory. Thats why we
have to do it this way.

TIA


On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:00 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>>
>> Hello All:
>>
>> Running 5.2 at our university. We have several student's processes
>> that take up too much memory. Our system have 64G of RAM and some
>> processes take close to 32-48G of RAM. This is causing many problems
>> for others. I was wondering if there is a way to restrict memory usage
>> per process? If the process goes over 32G simply kill it. Any thoughts
>> or ideas?
>>
>>
>
> In /etc/profile, use "ulimit -v NNNN" (in kilobytes) to limit the max
> virtual of all processes spawned by that shell
>
>
> 32G per process on a 64G machine sounds like a bit much. wouldn't a limit
> more like 4GB per user session be more appropriate on a multiuser system?
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
5) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] strict memory
| +1 vote
Yes. Thanks. I was thinking of that too. Any other suggestions? TIA ...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Yes. Thanks. I was thinking of that too. Any other suggestions?

TIA



On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
<filbranden@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:48, Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was wondering if there is a way to restrict memory usage
>> per process? If the process goes over 32G simply kill it.
>
> You can limit the amount of virtual memory of a process with "ulimit
> -v". See "help ulimit" or "man bash" for more details.
>
> HTH,
> Filipe
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
6) Mag Gam [CentOS] strict memory
| +1 vote
Hello All: Running 5.2 at our university. We have several student's processes that take up too much...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Hello All:

Running 5.2 at our university. We have several student's processes
that take up too much memory. Our system have 64G of RAM and some
processes take close to 32-48G of RAM. This is causing many problems
for others. I was wondering if there is a way to restrict memory usage
per process? If the process goes over 32G simply kill it. Any thoughts
or ideas?

TIA
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
7) Mag Gam [CentOS] need filesystem recommendation
| +1 vote
Hi All, I have a backup site and I would like to rsync from production to backup site. However, I...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Hi All,

I have a backup site and I would like to rsync from production to
backup site. However, I would like to have all backups be compressed
so I can save space. Can anyone recommend a good way to do this? I am
currently using tar and bzip2 to do this.

TIA
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
8) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] compiling libarchive
| +1 vote
Thanks Ralph. Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I keep getting this...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Thanks Ralph.

Got libarchive compiled fine, now trying to compile archivemount I
keep getting this error now:

gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -W -MM archivemount.c > dep
gcc -larchive -lfuse -o archivemount archivemount.o
archivemount.o(.text+0x1474): In function `save':
: undefined reference to `archive_write_set_compression_gzip'
archivemount.o(.text+0x147f): In function `save':
: undefined reference to `archive_write_set_compression_bzip2'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [archivemount] Error 1


On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos@br-online.de> wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
>> Has anyone been able to compile libarchive and archivemount? I want to
>> use this with fuse.
>>
>> The compile is very tough for libarchive, I keep getting
>> tar/write.c:730: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use in
>> this function)
>
> e2fsprogs-devel is missing on your machine.
>
> Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
9) Mag Gam [CentOS] compiling libarchive
| +1 vote
Has anyone been able to compile libarchive and archivemount? I want to use this with fuse. The...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Has anyone been able to compile libarchive and archivemount? I want to
use this with fuse.

The compile is very tough for libarchive, I keep getting

c -o tar/bsdtar-util.o `test -f 'tar/util.c' || echo './'`tar/util.c
mv -f tar/.deps/bsdtar-util.Tpo tar/.deps/bsdtar-util.Po
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -I./libarchive -I./libarchive   -g -O2 -MT
tar/bsdtar-write.o -MD -MP -MF tar/.deps/bsdtar-write.Tpo -c -o
tar/bsdtar-write.o `test -f 'tar/write.c' || echo './'`tar/write.c
tar/write.c: In function `write_hierarchy':
tar/write.c:730: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use in
this function)
tar/write.c:730: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
tar/write.c:730: error: for each function it appears in.)
tar/write.c:732: error: `EXT2_NODUMP_FL' undeclared (first use in this function)
tar/write.c: In function `write_entry':
tar/write.c:915: error: `EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS' undeclared (first use in
this function)
make[1]: *** [tar/bsdtar-write.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/archivemount-0.5.3/libarchive-2.5.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

TIA
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
10) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
| +1 vote
where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is a problem I will submit a...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is
a problem I will submit a bug.




On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Scott Silva <ssilva@sgvwater.com> wrote:
> on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following:
>>
>> Hi,
>> i was wondering what is the status of 4.7
>> Thank you,
>> Best regards,
>> Adrian
>>
> 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in
> the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million
> dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware
> available.
>
> When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced.
>
> --
> MailScanner is like deodorant...
> You hope everybody uses it, and
> you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
11) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] Changing swap resume signature location
| +1 vote
This is a Debian specific command. I am certain something like this exists for CentOS too...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Patrice Guay
<patrice.guay@nanotechnologies.qc.ca> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Patrice Guay
>>> <patrice.guay@nanotechnologies.qc.ca> wrote:
>>>> At boot time, the system is looking for a resume signature on the
>>>> default SWAP partition that was defined during the OS installation.
>>>>
>>>> On several systems, I changed the location of the SWAP partition. How do
>>>> I change the location where the system looks at boot time for the resume
>>>> signature?
>>>>
>> 1. Format the swap partition again: sudo mkswap /dev/XXX
>> 2. Activate swap partition sudo swapon /dev/XXX
>> 3. Replace UUID=XXX in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume by
>>    "resume=/dev/XXX"
>> 4. Regenerate the initrd: sudo mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.XX
>> (same version as the kernel)
>>
>
> I cannot find the /etc/initramfs-tools directory on my system. Which
> package provides it under CentOS 5?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Patrice
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

This is a Debian specific command. I am certain something like this
exists for CentOS too...
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
12) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] Changing swap resume signature location
| +1 vote
1. Format the swap partition again: sudo mkswap /dev/XXX 2. Activate swap partition sudo swapon...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
1. Format the swap partition again: sudo mkswap /dev/XXX
2. Activate swap partition sudo swapon /dev/XXX
3. Replace UUID=XXX in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume by "resume=/dev/XXX"
4. Regenerate the initrd: sudo mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.XX
(same version as the kernel)




On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Mag Gam <magawake@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not create a new swap partition and place it in /etc/fstab ?
> You don't have to worry about swap signatures and all...
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Patrice Guay
> <patrice.guay@nanotechnologies.qc.ca> wrote:
>> At boot time, the system is looking for a resume signature on the
>> default SWAP partition that was defined during the OS installation.
>>
>> On several systems, I changed the location of the SWAP partition. How do
>> I change the location where the system looks at boot time for the resume
>> signature?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Patrice Guay
>> [email protected: patrice...@nanotechnologies.qc.ca]
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
13) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] Changing swap resume signature location
| +1 vote
Why not create a new swap partition and place it in /etc/fstab ? You don't have to worry about swap...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded ]
Why not create a new swap partition and place it in /etc/fstab ?
You don't have to worry about swap signatures and all...





On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Patrice Guay
<patrice.guay@nanotechnologies.qc.ca> wrote:
> At boot time, the system is looking for a resume signature on the
> default SWAP partition that was defined during the OS installation.
>
> On several systems, I changed the location of the SWAP partition. How do
> I change the location where the system looks at boot time for the resume
> signature?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Patrice Guay
> [email protected: patrice...@nanotechnologies.qc.ca]
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> [email protected: C...@centos.org]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected: C...@centos.org]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
14) Mag Gam Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 status
| +1 vote
Seems Redhat already released 4.7...
CentOS
[ Profile | Reply to group ] [ Flat  Thread  Threaded