Re: git?

* David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com> [2008-11-14 04:10]:
> Since the whole idea of "authoritative" is a bit loose in
> git anyway, I'd be supportive of using them as the "official
> mirror".

I don’t know why we couldn’t declare them both equally
authoritative as long as synching is set up so all official
repositories either stay perfectly in sync, or at least very
closely. That shouldn’t be hard to do with post-commit hooks,
and github provides a way to set one up.

Regards,