Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> This would seem to give everyone what they want.
> >>> Yea, that is another approach, making "Postgres" as a nickname more
> >>> visible. Can anyone see a good way to do that?
> >> Amend FAQ... that's all.
> >>
> >> Most people use it anyway ;)
> >
> > Is this something we can do now, no matter the outcome of the discussion?
> >
>
> Why not? I have zero problem with the FAQ amendment I suggested.
>
> Q. What is the official name of the project?
> A. PostgreSQL, but we accept Postgres as an official shortened version.
>
> I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
> mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly different).
OK, FAQ wording updated from:
! <P>PostgreSQL is pronounced <I>Post-Gres-Q-L</I>, and is also sometimes
! referred to as just <I>Postgres</I>. An audio file is available in
to:
! <P>PostgreSQL is pronounced <I>Post-Gres-Q-L</I>, but can also be
! referred to as simply <I>Postgres</I>. An audio file is available in
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Highlight