-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:>> Suppose as an alternative to "changing" the name, we just start >> promoting "Postgres" as an alternative version of PostgreSQL in the >> course of advocacy efforts, essentially promoting it to equal footing >> with PostgreSQL.>>>> I personally don't think that this would cause any substantial >> confusion, and would avoid the work involved in a full name change. >> Then, down the road, if we want to, we can revisit the decision.>>>> This would seem to give everyone what they want.> > Yea, that is another approach, making "Postgres" as a nickname more> visible. Can anyone see a good way to do that?Amend FAQ... that's all.
Most people use it anyway ;)
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donatePostgreSQL Replication:
http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG6tD9ATb/zqfZUUQRAuI3AJ0QDongwtaR0cF/kH3HtAAH03ws7gCeNo/4
/vH15NdEfOKmTeiDXxw4mxw=
=NFbO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.orgSIGNED