Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Change the name

>> I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
>> mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly
>> different).
>
> It seems like a good FAQ addition. The only downside I can see
> to adopting the two names as equally valid ways to describe PG is:
>
> Q. So... what is "QL" then?
> A. Aaaarrrrgggghhhh!

I humbly submit that those who would actually ask that, just be kindly
asked to move on to MySQL and leave us alone.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Cheers,
>   Steve
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
   UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/