Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Hey look at me! I'm top-posting!!! Nanny-nanny-poo-poo> > Come get me Trolls!Please do not top post. :)
> SATA drives typically do 60-70MBs, interleaved you> should see 120-140MB/s on sequential. Random IO on SATA> usually sucks too badly to even talk about...Eh? It cannot be worse than PATA drives now can it?