Hi Oron,
If you're going to try a nightly build I would suggest looking at 2.3. Amongst
other things it contains a number of patches for the IntakeService, specifically
the problem you're experiencing now.
HTH
Colin
-----Original Message-----
From: oron ogdan
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:57 AM
To: turbine-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Intake empty / Boolean fields behavior
Hello
Using the turbine 2.2.1 nightly build / src of 13-8-2003, Field.java
setProperty is checking for isSet before setting the filed on the mapped
object
but for Boolean fields for example, or for empty String fields this would
not work,
Also found this in the code in line 410
...
// this definition of not set might need refined. But
// not sure the situation will arise.
if ( ss.length == 0 || (ss.length == 1 && ss[0].length() == 0) )
...
Anyone with a good patch / tip ?
Regards
Oron
www.netada.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
[Turbine-dev] Intake empty / Boolean fields behavior
| Tweet |
|
Search Discussions
Discussion Posts
Previous
Follow ups
- Oron ogdan: Hi Colin Thx for the help, Can you or someone explain what's the best approach for dev / production in your opinion ? I was under the impression 2.2.1 was a more stable version and should be used for production. Oron -----Original Message----- From: Colin Chalmers Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:01 AM To: Turbine Developers List; oron.ogdan@netada.co.uk Subject: RE: Intake empty / Boolean fields behavior Hi Oron, If you're going to try a nightly build I would suggest looking at 2.3. Amongst
- Colin Chalmers: Oron, That's not entirely incorrect, but 2.3 is very_close_to_release and contains numerous important fixes. I wouldn't discount a 2.3.1 bug fix coming at some point, if needed, if I were you I'd go for 2.3. Colin Hi Colin Thx for the help, Can you or someone explain what's the best approach for dev / production in your opinion ? I was under the impression 2.2.1 was a more stable version and should be used for production. Oron -----Original Message----- From: Colin Chalmers Sent: Thursday,
Related Discussions
Discussion Overview
| group | dev
|
| categories | turbine |
| posted | Aug 13, '03 at 10:57p |
| active | Aug 14, '03 at 7:30a |
| posts | 4 |
| users | 2 |
| website | turbine.apache.org |
