FAQ

On Mon May 30 16:37:38 2016, tonyc wrote:
On Mon May 30 13:30:45 2016, sprout wrote:
I found this change to bisect-runner.pl very helpful. Is applying
this a good idea? I will go ahead in a few days if nobody objects.
It really should test and skip if the test fails.
First, I don’t know bisect-runner.pl or git-bisect well enough to make that change; secondly, it would not have helped for my use case, since I was getting module failures adjacent to the commit responsible for fixing the crash I’m trying to track.

So, perhaps for my use case I could add a separate --no-module-tests option. Any objections to that?

--

Father Chrysostomos


---
via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128294

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 3 of 5 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupperl5-porters @
categoriesperl
postedMay 30, '16 at 8:30p
activeMay 31, '16 at 1:36p
posts5
users2
websiteperl.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2017 Grokbase