Grokbase Groups Ant user June 2009
FAQ

[Ant-user] ant 1.7.1 bug in <record> with antcall !?

Gilbert Rebhan
Jun 9, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Hi,

after (finally) upgrading from ant 1.6.5 to ant 1.7.1 a teammate
discovered some strange behaviour =

He makes heavy use of antcall and uses the <record> task.
Now with ant 1.7.1 there are a lot of 0 byte lines in the logs,
his editor jumps automatically in hexmode when opening
such a logfile.

Compared to ant 1.6.5 several parts of the logs are missing - probably
overwritten by those 0 byte lines.
Whether heavy use of antcall is good or bad style, that behaviour of
<record> task in ant 1.7.1 is _very annoying_, as important parts of the
logs are missing now after the upgrade.

There was already a similar posting on the ant user list =
http://marc.info/?l=ant-user&m=123900769210029&w=2
but got no repsone.

So, is that a known bug among other users|developers, didn't find a
record in the bug database ?
Maybe it's already patched in repository !?
Any suggestions or workarounds ??


Regards, Gilbert



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org
reply

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 1 of 4 | next ›

2 users in discussion

Grimm, Markus: 2 posts Gilbert Rebhan: 2 posts