FAQ

Search Discussions

49 discussions - 150 posts

  • Now that we have the necessary components such as OAuth, JWT, JWS, JWE, OpenID Connect, we may be ready to resume the work. The environment is good that people are now looking at Smart Contract etc ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Feb 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
    Feb 17, 2016 at 10:07 am
  • So, we have spun out the following works from this WG. - OpenID Connect - JWS, JWE Now that we have completed the underpinnings, we can come back to the original purpose: The purpose of this WG is to ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Mar 14, 2014 at 9:47 am
    Mar 14, 2014 at 9:47 am
  • So, much of the earlier Contract Exchange work (underlying protocol) were taken up by the new Connect protocol. This means that the remaining bit of things that this working group has to do is to ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Oct 22, 2011 at 2:11 pm
    Oct 26, 2011 at 6:42 pm
  • Hi experts. CX Draft 3 is updated. Spec is here: wget http://bit.ly/cx_3 --no-check-certificate Some issues is here: wget http://bit.ly/cx_3_readme --no-check-certificate Best regards. ---- hideki ...
    Hideki naraHideki nara
    Nov 30, 2010 at 7:37 am
    Nov 30, 2010 at 7:37 am
  • Hi all, Acceptance is created at OP(Signatory) when End User agrees the Proposal. Contract doesn't include original Proposal in it, but just refer to that. So I think that Acceptance should better ...
    Hideki naraHideki nara
    Nov 17, 2010 at 8:11 pm
    Nov 17, 2010 at 8:11 pm
  • Hi, experts CX Draft 3 has been updated. - Terms are added and spec is rewritten with them. - Policy based contract is mentioned. OP may issue Contract if claims' condition is fine for configured ...
    Hideki naraHideki nara
    Oct 26, 2010 at 8:03 pm
    Oct 26, 2010 at 8:03 pm
  • Hi all I'm thinking of using JSON Encryption Envelope to encrypt responding data. (http://jsonenc.info/1.0/ ) Most of privacy data provided by CX data endpoint must not be so big, but some huge JSON ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Sep 28, 2010 at 7:00 am
    Sep 28, 2010 at 7:10 pm
  • Hi, experts. I'm thinking of the way to provide CX contract to other parties enlisted in the contract than RP and OP. Basic idea is contract identifier(CID) itself URI and any party can discover its ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 am
    Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 am
  • Hi experts. Contract files including all parties private data must be encryption intensive. So I'm thinking of "partial contract" for each party to reduce RSA encryption. ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Aug 27, 2010 at 5:36 am
    Aug 30, 2010 at 11:57 pm
  • Hi experts, SAML bearer assertions are going to be used for OAuth assertion profile. ( http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-campbell-oauth-saml-00.txt ) I think that CX Contracts can work as assertions as ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Aug 17, 2010 at 6:10 am
    Aug 17, 2010 at 6:10 am
  • Hi experts, I have provided the draft ( of the formal draft ? ) of Contract Exchange at Bitbucket wiki. ( http://bitbucket.org/hdknr/openidcx/wiki/SpecToc ) I'm happy if you can share your time to ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Jul 9, 2010 at 6:43 pm
    Jul 13, 2010 at 1:19 am
  • I had a talk with Hide yesterday. We were talking on how to preserve the privacy of the end user among bunch of services. The agreement we had was that we should encrypt the portion of the agreement ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jun 24, 2010 at 11:41 pm
    Jul 7, 2010 at 12:02 am
  • Hi, experts. I think that a CX Contract can enlist binding parties to OAuth 2.0 services consumers. Any comment is welcome. 1. Declare an endpoint as an OAuth service. If the ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    May 27, 2010 at 9:03 am
    May 27, 2010 at 8:16 pm
  • Hi, David. Thank you very much for mentioning the timestamping. ( I changed the subject ) =Nat and me have recognized the timestamping of contracts and one reason we firstly adapted XML to CX is the ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    May 12, 2010 at 9:12 am
    May 13, 2010 at 7:02 am
  • Hi. As you may be aware already, after the feedback of the last IIW, we have span out a portion of CX spec to Artifact Binding, as that portion was deemed useful even without Contract. The draft is ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    May 8, 2010 at 4:52 am
    May 8, 2010 at 4:52 am
  • In the current draft, <obiligation is an child element of <party . However, when we think about the multi-party scenario, unless we specify the target that the party is obliged to, it would have no ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    May 7, 2010 at 4:36 am
    May 12, 2010 at 8:28 am
  • Hi, about CX Templates. =Nat hinted that CX Templates may be fetched from any site if those are securly proteced agaginst alterations. That can be. If so, I think that templates don't have to be ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 27, 2010 at 5:05 am
    Apr 27, 2010 at 11:58 am
  • Here is my though about data fetch interface. Suppose https://example.com/datasource/ is the URI from which a recipient can obtain data based on the contract. Suppose http://example.org/contract/1234 ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Apr 22, 2010 at 7:08 am
    Apr 30, 2010 at 7:02 am
  • Hi, experts. I think that there should be rules for binding X.509 subject used to sign a contract to /Contract/Party/@id. Two ways came to my mind : 1. XRD/XRDS discovered for /Contract/Party/@id ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 20, 2010 at 6:08 am
    Apr 22, 2010 at 5:47 am
  • Hi,all I think we should define the meaning of /Contract/Party/URL element more precisely. 1. for OP This may be easy to define. If someone discovery this URL, the OP should return a XRDS/XDS which ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 15, 2010 at 6:52 am
    Apr 19, 2010 at 4:12 am
  • I think the Party element should have "for and on behalf of" information. Because the current /Contract/Party/Rel has only two type : http://openid.net/srv/cx/1.0/#proposer ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 14, 2010 at 9:06 am
    Apr 14, 2010 at 9:06 am
  • Hi,all =Nat told me that RPs can provide CX Template. Even more , any body can provide templates if those are not fake. It sounds reasonable. 2010/4/12 nara hideki <hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp :
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 14, 2010 at 5:59 am
    Apr 14, 2010 at 8:14 am
  • Hi, all I'm thinking of the CX discovery process. Any suggestion is welcome to correct. 1. Discover by Server Identifier. Because CX Service and its contract is quite specific and dependent on an OP, ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Apr 12, 2010 at 5:38 am
    Apr 12, 2010 at 5:38 am
  • Hi Hideki, I have listed some issues at http://github.com/openid/Contract-Exchange-Extension/issues Please have a look at them. Cheers, -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Mar 31, 2010 at 11:23 pm
    Apr 1, 2010 at 6:55 am
  • Hi,all. I'm thinking of a messing mechanism for OP to notfiy directly to RP about CX contract status after discussions with =Nat. There could be some ways. 1. AX update_url I'm not quite sure if OP ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Mar 25, 2010 at 7:36 am
    Mar 25, 2010 at 7:36 am
  • Hi. As the result of discussion with many folks in the OpenID community, I am spinning out some portion of CX to other working groups. They are: (1) Attribute Exchange 1.1, which is UP now and is in ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jan 28, 2010 at 11:35 pm
    Jan 28, 2010 at 11:35 pm
  • Hi. I have commited the newest rev to the working draft at github. I am attaching the HTML version here. -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ http://twitter.com/_nat_en An HTML ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jan 26, 2010 at 6:08 pm
    Jan 26, 2010 at 6:08 pm
  • Hi. I have posted a blog on Contract Exchange. http://www.sakimura.org/en/modules/wordpress/essence-of-contract-exchange/ It is a short note describing the most current draft and its underlying ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jan 20, 2010 at 1:24 am
    Jan 20, 2010 at 1:24 am
  • Hello all. I've just provided a sample use case and files for that at http://bit.ly/cx_shop_and_payment_1 . As described in http://bit.ly/cx_shop_and_payment_usecase_1 , it is simple ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Dec 30, 2009 at 6:53 am
    Dec 30, 2009 at 6:53 am
  • Hi Hideki, When I was looking at the example, I caught that the @id of proposal and contract are of xs:string type. These ought to be unique over some period of time (length depends on jurisdictions) ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 30, 2009 at 5:00 am
    Dec 30, 2009 at 5:27 am
  • Hi. I have included the example proposal and contract and committed to github. The example still does not include a sensible template. We are going to replace it soon. At the moment, we are thinking ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 30, 2009 at 4:51 am
    Dec 30, 2009 at 4:51 am
  • Thanks Hideki for the pull request. I have updated the repository, and also created a wiki version of it at http://wiki.openid.net/cx-1_0-draft It is now complete with XML Schema for the contract. ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 28, 2009 at 8:07 am
    Dec 28, 2009 at 8:44 am
  • Nat, others, I have a problem trying to understand what kind of contract can be established via CX. Can you give an example? Cheers, Chris
    Chris ObdamChris Obdam
    Dec 11, 2009 at 3:59 pm
    Dec 12, 2009 at 4:41 pm
  • This time, it is a plain text.
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 11, 2009 at 5:43 am
    Dec 11, 2009 at 5:43 am
  • Just testing to see if this list is working. =hdknr's post seems to be not getting through. =nat
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 11, 2009 at 5:38 am
    Dec 11, 2009 at 5:38 am
  • Hello, all. I've been working with =nat on OpenID and OpenID CX for years. I'd like to know if all disclosure of a contract should be always public or not. As with a case of a payment scenario: 1. ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Dec 11, 2009 at 4:32 am
    Dec 11, 2009 at 5:35 am
  • Hi All: David set up the github repository a while ago for OpenID specs. The address for openid projects at github is as follows: http://github.com/openid/ The repository address for CX is as ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Dec 8, 2009 at 8:42 am
    Dec 8, 2009 at 8:42 am
  • Sorry that I have been very quiet. Been swamped last 45 days. I finally managed to have time to create sequence diagram for Artifact Binding. http://www.sakimura.org/en/modules/wordpress/index.php?p� ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Oct 8, 2009 at 11:43 am
    Oct 8, 2009 at 11:43 am
  • Hi John, It seems you do not have signature over the artifact message through browser in SAML. What was the justification for it? =nat at Tokyo via iPhone
    NatNat
    Sep 16, 2009 at 1:42 pm
    Sep 16, 2009 at 3:23 pm
  • I attended UMA (User Managed Access) WG at Kantara Initiative yesterday. That prompted me writing the following blog post. Have a look at: http://www.sakimura.org/en/modules/wordpress/index.php?p� -- ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Sep 16, 2009 at 12:38 pm
    Sep 16, 2009 at 12:38 pm
  • John, Sorry, I fixed it. Direct request should take precedence. MUST happen after the artifact look up as the claimed id is in it. Sequence-wise, the OP does not return a positive assertion here but ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Aug 20, 2009 at 2:02 am
    Aug 25, 2009 at 2:06 am
  • This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070403070601050505000607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We, Contract Exchange Working ...
    Tatsuo KUDOTatsuo KUDO
    Jul 30, 2009 at 3:16 pm
    Aug 3, 2009 at 1:30 am
  • --------------000705060203060902010800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All: To explain the concept of CX better, and by doing so, ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jul 30, 2009 at 4:53 am
    Dec 8, 2009 at 8:09 am
  • Hi. Sorry that it is so slow for me to get fully involved. I would like to start discussion from the concept. Without understanding the general concept, the discussion can go sideways quite easily. ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jul 8, 2009 at 4:15 am
    Jul 16, 2009 at 12:25 pm
  • Hello all :) In attachment i send my contribution agreement. I had already send it to Nat and Don but i forgot to send it to the list, sorry. Please let me know if something isn't wright. Thanks, ...
    Diana AlmeidaDiana Almeida
    Jun 25, 2009 at 2:12 pm
    Jun 25, 2009 at 2:12 pm
  • =hdknr is busily preparing the initial document for the current thought now (which is going to be submit around Wednesday), but I will start introducing concept here little by little. (I thought of ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jun 8, 2009 at 10:50 am
    Jun 8, 2009 at 10:50 am
  • --001e6837894720f97d046b96bfd4 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary
    David GarciaDavid Garcia
    Jun 5, 2009 at 2:45 am
    Jun 5, 2009 at 9:45 am
  • --0015174c0fa80ccc2e046b945b63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all =hdknr has provided my contribution agreement on my pubic repository. URL is here: ...
    Nara hidekiNara hideki
    Jun 4, 2009 at 11:53 pm
    Jun 5, 2009 at 6:53 am
  • I did not see my contribution agreement on the OIDF web so I am posting it here as a proof. It would probably have to be counter singed by Don, but to me, this form is mysterious. Just unilateral ...
    Nat SakimuraNat Sakimura
    Jun 3, 2009 at 10:23 am
    Jun 3, 2009 at 10:23 am
Group Navigation
period‹ prev | Latest | first ›
Group Overview
groupopenid-specs-cx @
categoriesopenid
discussions49
posts150
users16
websiteopenid.net
irc#openid